Alfa Romeo Owners Club of Australia Forum proudly hosted by AROCA Victorian Division
August 20, 2008, 05:50:48 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please edit your forum profile to set your AROCA State Division.  See this post for more information.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Which 75 to buy.  (Read 586 times)
265coupe
Newbie
*
AROCA Division: Not a Member (Yet!)
Posts: 2


View Profile
« on: July 15, 2008, 08:01:16 PM »

Gidday,

I have already posted this question on a Pommie forum and received some good replies but I am keen on getting an Aussie perspective.

Shortly I'll buy a 75 as my car, the families second. It will be for road use only, spirited of course.

The budget is small but I'll pay a far price for a fair car. That leaves a 2.0l TS or a 2.5l V6. The 3.0l will be out of my price range.

The big question is which model to buy. It'll have to be a manual (no V6 autos thanks).

Please everyone, personal comments on each. Which one is the best balance of performance, handling, reliability, servicabilty and the all important 'grin factor'.

I'm in Qld and there seems to be a lack of available cars but I'm prepared to wait.

One last question. Was a factory sunroof offered in Aus. I have seen cars advertised with both glass and steel sunroofs. I'm keen on one.

Thanks, Mick
Logged
265coupe
Newbie
*
AROCA Division: Not a Member (Yet!)
Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2008, 07:48:57 PM »

What, is everyone to busy driving their 75 or maybe laying under it fixing something.
Logged
Stephen Aarons
Newbie
*
AROCA Division: Victoria
Posts: 48


MY 75 TS


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2008, 08:21:44 PM »

Hey Mick,
I drive a 75 Twin Spark, its great fun around town and also fairly good on petrol.
The Twin Spark also comes with an LSD, and the 2.5 V6 does not.

Not sure what else to tell you, but hopefully this will motivate others to contribute.
Logged
Anthony Miller
Newbie
*
AROCA Division: Victoria
Posts: 26



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2008, 07:30:53 AM »

Hey Mick, I drive a 3.0l 75 which is great, just hold it in 2nd with the window open and it's all worth it, gotta love that noise. I've also owned a twinnie but that was a transplant into a giullietta, needless to say that was a fantastic engine which I can highly recomend plus, as you said, you get the lsd so go the twinnie as everything on the 3.0l is more expensive and difficult to find.As for the sunroof, steel= Factory, glass= aftermarket.
good luck
Anthony
Logged

Now- '88 75 3.0l(gunmetal)
Then- '81 Guillietta 2.0l transplant (ol whitey)
         '82 Guillietta 2.0l transplant (ol brownie)
         '82 Guillietta 2.0l TS transplant (ol red)
hammer
Jr. Member
**
AROCA Division: Queensland
Posts: 89


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2008, 09:00:38 PM »

Mick,

I have also owned the 3.0 and the twinspark. The 3.0 did make a sensational noise and had tremendous straight line speed but the twinnie, in my opinion is a better alrounder. I realise you are tossing up between the 2.5 and the 2.0 but I make the comparison as it is still V6 vs 4cyl.

The twinspark is cheaper to run, register and generally repair. It has a decent amount of power, great handling and tremendous feel. I recently bought a 2005 156 TI and to be honest, I wish it was a three year old 75 twinspark!

I converted my twinnie into a club racer and have had an awesome time with it. It has been a great experience learning the fine details of the models as I've slowly made modifications. The twinspark motor in standard form mixes it on the track with several of the modified 4 plug 2 litres.

And yes, they did come with sunroofs as an option in Australia.

I think Julian Lord has a twinspark that he is currently looking to sell in Brisbane. There is very little that Julian doesn't know about twinnies and he has done most of the work on mine. Send me a PM is you would like his details.

Regards,

Brent
Logged
pep105
Newbie
*
AROCA Division: Victoria
Posts: 45


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2008, 09:07:18 PM »

Hey Mick,
Many years ago I had the same delema in choosing between the 2.5 and Twinspark. Test drove both and ended up with an 88 Twinspark although wasnt to fussed to have either. The V6 sounds fantastic however the Twinspark has the aforementioned Limo diff as mentioned by Stephen and has the more advanced Bosch Motronic Injection system.

It was part of the series two facelift in early 88 that included the body kit, revised velour interior and instruments same as the 2.5 auto and the first of the 3.0L versions. (2.5 manual had been dropped and was replaced by the Twinspark). All up a great allrouder thats fun and reliable
Cheers
Pep
Logged

Current
'74 GT 1600 Jnr
Past
'82 Fiat 131 Superbrava
'82 Alfetta GTV 2.0
'88 75 Twinspark
'80 Alfetta
'02 147 Twinspark
deano
Newbie
*
AROCA Division: Victoria
Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2008, 07:37:31 PM »

hey mick,

a friend of mine has a TS and I think as a daily, it does a much better job then the v6. personally i havnt driven any 2.5s but from what i can gather, it will cost more when things go wrong and will use more fuel. the 2.5 gives you around the same performance for more fuel. The LSD would sell it for me, there is nothing worse then putting your foot down and spinning the inside wheel like i do in my volvo Angry.

i just bought a 3.0L for the weekend but if i were to replace my daily volvo, the TS would win. its more balanced compared to the v6 as well.

dont worry about the noise factor, i think the TS sounds great anyways!

i've seen some nice ones around lately, there is one in adelaide on car sales that looks good, but he wants a lot for it. you can snap up a good one really cheap if you dont mind a few scratches here and there

good luck! Grin

deano

Logged

'91 75 3.0L potenziata (club car)
'84 Volvo 360 GLT (daily, broken gear linkages, DOH!)
125 cc Pit Bike (ticket to hospital)
Paul Newby
Newbie
*
AROCA Division: New South Wales
Posts: 31



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2008, 01:00:22 PM »

I'm in the Twin Spark camp as well.

I owned a TS for three years and before buying it I test drove both 2.5 and 3.0 before going with the Twinnie (a late 90 model.)

The 2.5s didn't do anything for me with their open diffs and the earlier interiors weren't up to much.

I didn't get to drive a Potenziata which I think has a 4:1 diff but an early one with the 3.7 (or is it 3.5?) was ridiculously over geared. I don't think I got it out of third on the test drive.

The TS engine is a lot cheaper to maintain than a V6 (really nothing goes wrong) and other issues like power sterring pumps and lousy electrics are common for all models.

To cap it off the TS handles better than any V6 75 (with standard torsion bars) but its handling wasn't a patch on my lightly modded Alfetta 1.8...  Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.135 seconds with 20 queries.